Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 is a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip, with a 91.5 score against 88.5. IPhone 13's construction is newer and a little bit lighter than Galaxy Z Flip's, although it is just a little thicker. IPhone 13 works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy Z Flip works with Android 12 OS. The iPhone 13 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 13 has a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better camera than iPhone 13, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same video definition, a 12 mega-pixels back-facing camera and the same 60 fps video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit longer battery performance than iPhone 13, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3227mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the iPhone 13 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.