Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 overall score. IPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is newer, but a bit thicker and way heavier than the Galaxy Z Flip.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1284 x 2778 resolution. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. IPhone 13 Pro Max has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 32 percent more battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.