Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro has an overall score of 95.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 score. The iPhone 14 Pro has iOS 16.x operating system, and Galaxy Z Flip comes with Android 12 operating system. IPhone 14 Pro is a incredibly newer phone than the Galaxy Z Flip, but it is heavier and a little bit thicker.
IPhone 14 Pro features a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly better 1179 x 2556 resolution. Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 14 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a lot better 48 MP resolution camera in the back. Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, iPhone 14 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.