Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has an overall score of 94.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 global score. The iPhone 14 Pro Max is a extremely newer cellphone than the Galaxy Z Flip, but it is noticeably heavier and just a little thicker. IPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x OS, while Galaxy Z Flip counts with Android 12 OS.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a slightly better resolution of 1290 x 2796px and a little higher pixel amount in each inch of display.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory. IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4323mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.