Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 9.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone 6s's 83 general score. Galaxy Z Flip's body has the same thickness than Apple iPhone 6s, but it is extremely heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip comes with Android 12 OS, and Apple iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x OS. Apple iPhone 6s has a little better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processor.
The Apple iPhone 6s features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a way lower 1334 x 750 pixels resolution, a really smaller screen and a bit less pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 6s, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots slightly better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments, a larger back-facing camera sensor and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Z Flip has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 6s, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the iPhone 6s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as iPhone 6s. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the iPhone 6s, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.