Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than iPhone X, with an 88.5 score against 88.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is notably newer and a little thinner, but just a bit heavier than the iPhone X. IPhone X features a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit worse 1125 x 2436px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The iPhone X's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip's one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. Apple iPhone X counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Galaxy Z Flip features longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 22% more battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip captures slightly better photographs and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is more expensive than the iPhone X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as iPhone X. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some dollars and get the iPhone X, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.