Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Apple iPhone XR, with a global score of 88.5 against 82. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and thinner than Apple iPhone XR. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a better pixel amount per display inch and a quite larger display.
The Apple iPhone XR has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than iPhone XR. Both of them have a F1.8 aperture, a same size back-facing camera sensor, a same resolution camera in the back, the same video definition and the same video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Apple iPhone XR, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Apple iPhone XR. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.