Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the iPhone XS, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 84.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit heavier than the iPhone XS, it's a bit thinner and also newer. The Apple iPhone XS counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1125 x 2436, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone XS. They have the same back camera sensor size, the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is more expensive than the iPhone XS, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as iPhone XS. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy iPhone XS, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.