Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-07-12 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe's score of 77.5. The Galaxy Z Flip body is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe's, although it's a bit heavier. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a just a bit greater display pixels density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bigger display.
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe has more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 128 GB. Galaxy Z Flip has a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy Z Flip and the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in low-light environments, lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit longer battery life than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.