Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, getting a score of 88.5 against 76.2. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is just a little heavier than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, it's a little bit thinner and a lot newer. Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit lower pixels number in each inch in the display, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little bit smaller screen. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have a same size sensor, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.