Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6, having a global score of 88.5 against 81.1. Galaxy Z Flip's design is noticeably newer, way thinner and just a bit lighter than Google Nexus 6. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, providing the user some extra features.
Google Nexus 6 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster processor than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs more than Google Nexus 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.