Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Google Pixel's score of 80.2. Galaxy Z Flip's body is extremely newer and thinner, but notably heavier than the Google Pixel. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, a lesser MP resolution back facing camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has greater battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.