Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4, getting a general score of 88.5 against 81.9. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is somewhat thinner but somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 4, and both of them were released with only 4 months difference. Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a worse video quality, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and a camera with less MP resolution, they both have the same back camera sensor size.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.