Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, having an 88.5 score against 82.9. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is just a little lighter and thinner than the Google Pixel 4 XL, even when they were released with only 4 months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 12% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, a worse (4K) video quality and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4 XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4 XL, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.