Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting an 88.5 score against 87.5. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features and increased performance. The Galaxy Z Flip design is thinner than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it's a bit heavier and was released just 9 months before.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little bit better display density and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip and Google Pixel 4a 5G count with quite similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a back facing camera with more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, a same size camera sensor and the same video definition.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has an 18% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.