Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. The Google Pixel 5 body is just a bit thicker but lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and they were released only a couple of months apart. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 5. They have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Google Pixel 5 has better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 24% more battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 has a camera that's very similar to the Galaxy Z Flip one, and although the Google Pixel 5 has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations and a more MP camera, they both have the same video frame rates, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 5 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.