Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Honor 50 Pro, with an 88.5 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than Honor 50 Pro, but it's just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11, providing some extra features.
Honor 50 Pro has a display that is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip's screen, and although the Honor 50 Pro has a bit higher pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1236 x 2676px, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Honor 50 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Honor 50 Pro's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip's one, both have equal internal storage capacity. The Honor 50 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.