Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 425 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design construction is way newer than Galaxy Z Flip's, but it's way heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a little bit better pixels density, a little higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a bit larger display. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 16 GB more RAM.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light captures, a camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has more internal storage. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 70 percent more battery capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design costs a little more than the Galaxy Z Flip, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.