Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than HTC U Ultra, having an 88.5 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra features a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. HTC U Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with better video frame rates.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more money than HTC U Ultra, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.