Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than HTC U11, having a overall score of 88.5 against 77.6. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is just a little heavier than the HTC U11, it's just a little thinner and also way newer. The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same (4K) video quality and the same sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with faster video frame rates.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip has a little longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC U11, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.