Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Titanium and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than LG K61, having a overall score of 88.5 against 77.6. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than LG K61, although both of them were released only a few months apart.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little better hardware performance than LG K61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper display than LG K61, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite larger display.
Galaxy Z Flip features a much better camera than LG K61, because although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. LG K61 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K61 has improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.