Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the LG K62's score of 78.2. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while LG K62 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Z Flip body is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG K62, even though it was released just 10 months before.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a brighter screen than LG K62, because it has a much higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger display and a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor and a back camera with way less megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The LG K62 has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K62 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.