Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than LG K92, with an 88.5 score against 85.4. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while LG K92 has Android 10. Galaxy Z Flip's design is thinner and a little lighter than LG K92, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper display than LG K92, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG K92 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG K92 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG K92. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG K92, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.