Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Mirror black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than LG Q70, with an 88.5 score against 77.9. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features and optimized performance. Galaxy Z Flip's design is thinner and a bit lighter than the LG Q70, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Q70, because it has a just a little higher pixel number in each screen inch, a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite larger screen.
LG Q70 counts with a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The LG Q70 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG Q70, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.