Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than LG Stylo 6, having a global score of 88.5 against 76.7. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip and the LG Stylo 6 were released with only 3 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features and improved performance.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processor than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better looking screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a quite better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.