Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having a overall score of 88.5 against 87.6. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than LG V60 ThinQ, even though both were released with only 1 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a little greater display density.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a way better video quality and a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos.
LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.