Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a general score of 91.2 against 88.5. Although it's the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also notably heavier and incredibly thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the LG Wing has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster CPU than LG Wing. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy Z Flip features a little more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG Wing has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Wing also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Wing has longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity.
LG Wing counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the LG Wing also has a way more MP back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, LG Wing is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.