Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Microsoft |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, having a general score of 88.5 against 85.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has Android 11 version. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older and way thicker than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, it's construction is still extremely lighter.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels and a larger display. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than Microsoft Surface Duo 2. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4449mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Microsoft Surface Duo 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.