Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Forged Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Motorola Defy (2021), with an 88.5 score against 77.2. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version, giving a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than Motorola Defy (2021), but Samsung could make it way lighter and notably thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a more vivid display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a little bit bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a lot better pixel count per inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster CPU than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy Z Flip has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.