Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a score of 89.6 against 88.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version. Despite being the best we are comparing here, it must be told that it is also a lot thicker and a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than Motorola edge, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Motorola edge counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola edge also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Motorola edge features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola edge also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola edge counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola edge is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.