Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Motorola Edge 20, with an 88.5 score against 86.1. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Motorola Edge 20 has Android 11 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance tweaks. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 20, but it's somewhat heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a just a little greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2636px resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 20 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 20 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.