Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's general score of 88.5. Both of these phones include the same Android 12 OS, so they should provide you identical OS features. Although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is newer than the Galaxy Z Flip, it's a little bit thicker and a little heavier.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a lot more mega pixels camera. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.