Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s 84.7 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a much older and a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge (2022), but Samsung managed to build it thinner anyway. These devices work with the same Android 12 OS (operating system), so both should offer identical operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Edge (2022). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Edge (2022), letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.