Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is thinner than the Motorola Edge (2024), but it is a little bit heavier and was released many years before.
Motorola Edge (2024) features a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a little worse count of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge (2024). They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge (2024)'s camera is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip one, and although the Motorola Edge (2024) has a back camera with a lot better resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor, they both have a same size aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola Edge (2024) have quite similar memory for applications and games, they have equal internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge (2024) has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Edge (2024), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Edge (2024). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Edge (2024), and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.