Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 score. Although Galaxy Z Flip is much older and a little heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 12 operating system.
Galaxy Z Flip has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.