Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting a global score of 88.5 against 80.9. The Galaxy Z Flip design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 12 OS (Operating System), so both of them should count with identical OS features.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little lower screen density, they both have a same size display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a camera with a way better 200 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.