Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 global score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much older than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little worse display pixel density, they both have a screen with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has as much storage for applications and games as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot better video quality, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.