Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 88.5 score against 81.9. Galaxy Z Flip is an extremely older and a little bit heavier device than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1256 x 2760px resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo's storage for apps and games is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 31% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.