Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s 78.9 overall score. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Z Flip features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite higher pixel density. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) shoots clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) and Galaxy Z Flip count with very similar memory for games and applications, they have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.