Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a global score of 88.5 against 86.3. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Z Flip is an notably older phone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but Samsung could make it thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, they both have a same size screen. Galaxy Z Flip features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% bigger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos and a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.