Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a score of 88.5 against 87.1. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is incredibly older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is just a bit lighter and thinner. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite lower display pixels density, they both have a same size display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.