Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G, with a score of 88.5 against 81.5. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features and performance optimizations. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than Moto G 5G, it's construction is way thinner and lighter.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Moto G 5G captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G also counts with a larger aperture to take better images in low light situations and a back-facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto G 5G has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.