Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G Plus's overall score of 82.6. Even when Galaxy Z Flip and Moto G 5G Plus were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat lighter and thinner. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a little better count of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more MP camera in the back and a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.