Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version, giving a lot of extra features. Galaxy Z Flip is a a bit lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Motorola Moto G Power, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better screen than Moto G Power, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G Power features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in low light environments and a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto G Power, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.