Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), getting a score of 88.5 against 76.5. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), despite of the fact that it was released only 11 months before. The Galaxy Z Flip features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a bit bigger display, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Moto G Power (2021) has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a larger aperture, a camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Moto G Power (2021) has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power (2021). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G Power (2021), letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.