Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), even though it was released only 11 months before. Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has slightly more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) shoots clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments and a much better resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus (2021). If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G Stylus (2021), giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.