Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having an 88.5 score against 76. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much older than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's design is notably thinner and just a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a bit better pixel number in each inch in the screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit larger display. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip one, both have equal internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a much faster CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot lower photo and video quality and a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.