Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G100 is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip, with an 88.9 score against 88.5. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G100 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version. Motorola Moto G100's construction is newer than the Galaxy Z Flip's, although it's heavier and noticeably thicker.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G100, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite higher count of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy Z Flip. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto G100 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a lot higher video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G100 has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.