Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Moto G200 5G's overall score of 86.2. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Moto G200 5G has Android 11, giving you a couple additional features and a performance increase. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is older than Moto G200 5G, it's construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip both count with quite similar processors, they have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.