Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-12-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Motorola Moto G31, getting an 88.5 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older and just a bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto G31, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Motorola Moto G31 has Android 11.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G31, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a just a little better display density and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster CPU than Moto G31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G31, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Moto G31 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G31 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G31 also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.